Religious Freedom Under Threat

Executive Summary

What's Happening

The CRL Rights Commission is advancing proposals for mandatory church licensing, state-appointed oversight committees, and regulatory control over religious leadership. These measures would grant government unprecedented authority to approve clergy, dictate church operations, and interfere directly in matters of faith and doctrine previously protected by constitutional guarantee.

Why It Matters

Religious freedom stands as both a precious South African value and a fundamental constitutional right. Yet this bedrock principle faces unprecedented threat as government seeks to regulate and control religious institutions. The implications extend far beyond any single denomination, threatening the very foundation of our democratic society.

What's at Stake

Success here establishes dangerous precedent for state control over all religious communities across South Africa. Every faith tradition - Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, and others - faces potential government interference in sacred matters of doctrine, leadership, and worship. This represents a fundamental departure from constitutional democracy toward authoritarian oversight of conscience itself.

Sign the Petition

Add your voice and make a difference. Every signature counts.

Sign Now

Photo Gallery

Images related to this issue

Issue Context

Our Faith Position

Our commitment to biblical truth guides our stance on this issue. We believe Scripture provides clear direction for how Christians should respond to matters of faith, freedom, and governance.

Key Scripture References

Biblical foundations that inform our position

"But Peter and the apostles answered, 'We must obey God rather than men.'"
Acts 5:29
"Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment."
Romans 13:1-2
"Honor everyone. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the emperor."
1 Peter 2:17

Additional references

,

Theological Foundation

Understanding the biblical principles behind our stance

Core Biblical Principles

  • Divine Authority: God's authority supersedes human government, and believers must obey God rather than men when authorities contradict God's commands
  • Conscience Rights: Freedom to live according to biblical convictions and practice faith without state interference in matters of doctrine and worship
  • Prophetic Voice: Called to speak truth to power when necessary, maintaining that matters of faith, doctrine, and church governance belong to God alone

Scripture teaches us to honor governing authorities as established by God, while maintaining our primary allegiance to God Himself. When human authorities demand what contradicts God's commands or seeks to control religious practice, believers must respectfully but firmly choose obedience to God. The proposed state regulation of religious institutions crosses this biblical boundary by placing government authority over matters of faith, doctrine, and church governance that belong solely to God and His people.

Historical Precedent

The history of the church is filled with examples of believers who refused to allow government to control matters of faith. When the Roman Empire demanded worship of the emperor, early Christians chose martyrdom rather than compromise their allegiance to Christ. During the Reformation, reformers like Martin Luther stood before imperial authorities at the Diet of Worms, declaring 'Here I stand, I can do no other' when ordered to recant their biblical convictions. In Nazi Germany, pastors like Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Confessing Church refused state control over church doctrine and leadership. In communist countries, underground churches continued to meet and preach despite state prohibition. When governments seek to license, approve, or regulate religious practice, faithful Christians throughout history have consistently maintained that matters of faith, doctrine, and church governance belong to God alone, not to earthly authorities.

Case Against This Proposal

A summary of our objections, suggested actions, and a constructive alternative approach.

Key Arguments

  • Existing laws already cover criminal acts
  • Proposal is unconstitutional (state control of religious practice)
  • Unworkable (requires massive bureaucratic oversight)
  • Violates separation of church and state principle
  • Courts traditionally don't adjudicate doctrinal matters
  • Direct conflict with religious freedom guarantees

Recommended Actions

  • Churches should adopt voluntary codes of conduct
  • Religious institutions should self-regulate
  • Public should object through letters, petitions, emails
  • Contact Commission, Government, and political representatives
  • Organize powerful joint action to oppose the proposal

Alternative Solution

Voluntary code of conduct for religious institutions

Status:Proposed to Commission in 2018 but rejectedAvailability:Freely available for any religious institution to adopt

Issue Updates

Stay informed with the latest developments on this issue.

Petition Progress and Draft Report Published

Our petition on this issue has been signed by 128 people so far. Thank you for your support, but we are pushing for many more signatures! The threat to religious freedom is real and the CRL Commission is not backing down from its destructive course of action.

In December a so-called draft report has been published, containing the same proposals for a law that would create a statutory council for keeping oversight over all churches and denominations. Clothed in language that sounds as if a system of self-regulation is proposed, the report provides for the opposite – a statutory council, registration of churches and clergy, procedures for complaints, and powers to impose sanctions on churches, which can include deregistration and suspension. At the press conference the chair of the Commission confirmed that the proposals would be enforced.

We reject these proposals as strongly as ever, because they deeply violate our religious freedom and are completely unconstitutional. By targeting the Christian faith only, the proposals are unconstitutional for another reason. They amount to unfair discrimination on the basis of religion and belief, which is not allowed by the Constitution.

We intend to send the petition that many of you signed to the Commission as soon as possible. Share this with friends, family and church members and let's get those signatures in! We'll be joining many other voices being heard louder and louder now in opposition to the Commission's proposals.

In the meantime, the chair of the committee appointed by the Commission to drive its proposal resigned on 15 January 2026, claiming interference by the chair of the Commission to the extent that he was unable to perform his functions. He was not even involved in the preparation of the draft report published in December. In his press statement he also mentioned various other irregularities as well as bias towards certain churches by the chair of the Commission. If true, this puts a huge question mark behind the Commission's credibility. Our religious freedom should not be entrusted to a body guilty of bias towards people of faith and of various irregularities in conducting its business. The Commission should get its own house in order instead of bothering us with its misplaced ambition to control the church.

Western Cape March Success

The Western Cape Provincial Christian March held on 13 November 2025 was a resounding success, with over 15,000 believers gathering in Cape Town to stand united against state regulation of religious institutions.

Church leaders from across denominations addressed the crowd, emphasizing the importance of religious freedom and the unconstitutional nature of the CRL Commission's proposals. The peaceful demonstration sent a clear message to government officials that faith communities will not accept state interference in matters of doctrine and church governance.

Parliamentary Committee Hearing Scheduled

A parliamentary portfolio committee has scheduled public hearings on the CRL Commission's regulatory proposals for early 2026. This provides a critical opportunity for faith communities to formally present their objections to the proposed licensing and peer review mechanisms.

Religious organizations are encouraged to prepare written submissions and register to participate in oral presentations. Voice of Faith will be coordinating a unified response from member churches.

National Christian March Draws Thousands

The National Christian March on 8 October 2025 saw an estimated 50,000 participants gather in Pretoria to protest against proposed government regulation of churches. Representatives from over 200 denominations participated in what organisers called the largest demonstration of religious unity in South Africa's democratic history.

The march concluded at the Union Buildings where a memorandum was delivered to government representatives outlining the constitutional concerns with the CRL Commission's proposals.